英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
emph查看　emph　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
emph查看　emph　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
emph查看　emph　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • What is the difference between \em and \emph? - TeX
    1 From what I understood, em is the TeX command and emph is its LaTeX equivalent Therefore, you should use the emph when using LaTeX
  • fonts - \emph or \textit - TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange
    The \emph macro is designed to be semantic markup So while by convention it makes text italic, this is not always the case For example, the beamer class makes \emph text red as this works better in presentations than using italic On the other hand, \textit makes text italic, with no variation Thus it is intended for making text italic when that is exactly what you want I would usually
  • \textit is to \emph as \textbf is to. . . ? - TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange
    The idea behind \emph is that it provides a high level way for giving emphasis to a part of the text High level in the sense it is “independent” of the actual implementation The default behavior of \emph is to use italics when in an upright context and upright when in an italics context, but this can be modified on a document’s basis (or by a package implementing a particular style
  • Redefine \emph to be both bold and italic - TeX
    That sort of works by luck , but \let\emphold\emph doesn't save the real definition of \emph it just saves the top level (which is \def\emph{\protect\emph_} (where _ is a space) you happened to use \renewcommand rather than \declarerobustcommand to redefine \emph so the internal definition was not over- written but if you put that in a moving
  • text decorations - Getting \emph back to normal after loading ulem . . .
    I'm typesetting a manuscript that is required to turn all \\emph into underlines But then I want to use the original definition of \\emph for the list of references How do I get \\emph to behave like
  • Changing the behaviour of `\emph` inside an environment - TeX
    I want to change the behaviour of \\emph{} command inside definitions to be bold rather than italic This question has a nice and elegant solution for the problem (or so it seems) It just doesn't
  • emphasis - \emph and punctuation - TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange
    I know \\emph is to be used to emphasize text However once in a while, a punctuation mark follows emphasized text, mostly commas and periods When \\emph makes text italic, it should extend to the
  • What is the canonical way to redefine the \emph command
    Question says it all What is the best way to redefine the \\emph command to be bold font and upright?
  • Biblatex, emphasized italic entries and redefined \emph {}
    Many Biblatex-Styles use \mkbibemph{} to typeset italic parts of an bibliographic entry By default, \mkbibemph{} is defined as \emph{} My Problem: If one redefines \emph{} like \renewcommand{\emph}[1]{\texttt{\color{red} #1}}, this breaks the intended appearance of the selected bib-style I tried to use \let\mkbibemph\mkbibitalic to avoid this, but had no success I read Non-italic \emph
  • fonts - Commands \emph and \textit dont work correctly in beamer . . .
    I'm new to beamer package but I think \emph and \textit don't work correctly here The following code gives similar straight 'Texts' I have read questions Why \emph {} is not working in beamer? and Beamer does not restore roman style for emph inside emph but it's still not clear for me what is wrong I use version 3 58 of beamer package





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009